I Would Risk Everything for Your Children, But It Shouldn’t Be Necessary

pregnant woman throwing toddler in the air sitting by a treeGet Pregnant Fast

In today’s world, the conversation surrounding child safety has reached a critical point. As a parent, I can wholeheartedly say that I would put myself in harm’s way to protect your child. The thought brings tears to my eyes as I watch my own little one play on her mat. I cherish your child and the trust you place in me with the most precious aspect of your life. However, the harsh reality is that I shouldn’t have to be in a position where such sacrifices are even considered.

Lockdown drills have become part of our routine, yet one has to wonder: what does a locked door truly mean against a gunman? It merely signals that a classroom of frightened children is huddled inside, muffling their cries and praying for safety. I believe every educator has their own personal strategy for lockdowns. Are the closets spacious enough? Can we barricade the door with furniture? Can we escape to safety through the windows?

Instead of preparing for the worst-case scenario, let’s focus on prevention. It’s time to reassess our gun laws. What justification is there for owning an automatic weapon? Just the desire to possess one? I want to live. I want my 33 students to thrive. I want my child to attend school in the future and come home safe. Why should anyone’s right to bear arms outweigh my right to life?

The argument that “guns don’t kill people; people kill people” misses a crucial point. What if these troubled individuals didn’t have easy access to firearms capable of mass destruction? Even if someone is determined to commit an act of violence, wouldn’t it be wiser to limit their capacity for harm? The world will never be flawless, and tragedies will inevitably occur. However, failing to intervene and allowing these events to persist is just as unacceptable as standing by and watching bullying.

Many assert, “I have the right to bear arms.” But what do you truly need a firearm for? Is it for protection? If so, a handgun might suffice. The likelihood of encountering a scenario involving multiple intruders is slim. And even then, your chances of survival are minimal regardless of your weaponry. Want to have fun? Engage in target shooting with a traditional rifle. There are countless other enjoyable activities that don’t require a semi-automatic weapon.

Some might argue, “The Constitution guarantees this right!” But does it? The framers of our Constitution could not have foreseen the existence of weapons designed for mass casualties. Should we also be allowed to possess grenade launchers, provided we have identification? That notion sounds absurd, doesn’t it? So too does the idea of civilians owning AR-15s. No civilian requires such a weapon.

To those who claim, “Drugs are illegal, yet they still exist!” While that’s true, it has undoubtedly restricted the number of individuals engaging in drug trafficking. You can’t simply stroll into a store and purchase illicit substances alongside your groceries. Similarly, making assault rifles illegal wouldn’t eradicate their availability, but it would make obtaining them significantly more difficult—a step in the right direction.

Imagine a future with fewer hashtags for thoughts and prayers, less focus on psychological profiles of shooters identified only after tragedy strikes, and fewer articles detailing missed warning signs. I experienced a college mass shooting firsthand, losing a classmate who was transitioning to a safer career as an elementary educator. It’s heartbreaking that her pursuit of safety ultimately led to her demise, a reality that continues to haunt educators everywhere.

When I returned home, I hugged my baby a little tighter and prepared to go back to my classroom. I will embrace my students next week, but I will also carry the weight of anxiety every time I see the alert system lights flash. We will conduct our drills, hoping the kids take them seriously, even if they don’t fully grasp the gravity of what it means. My first graders understand it as “in case there’s a bad guy,” and that’s as much as I want them to know.

I refuse to let my six-year-old students go home thinking, “I made it through another school day. I’m still alive.” We must do better for them. What carries more weight: your right to own a weapon or a child’s life? It’s time for America to reflect on this question.

For more insights on family planning and related topics, check out this resource and consider exploring the options for home insemination as well as this excellent guide on intrauterine insemination.

Summary:

This article emphasizes the need for improved child safety measures in schools amidst rising concerns about gun violence. It argues for a reevaluation of gun laws, advocating for the protection of children over the right to bear arms. The author expresses the emotional toll on educators and parents, highlighting the urgency for societal change to prioritize children’s lives.