Pixar’s latest film, “Soul,” raises important questions about representation and identity. While the movie beautifully explores complex themes of life and purpose, as a Black woman, there are significant issues I cannot overlook. Most notably, the film’s Black protagonist, Joe Gardner, spends a considerable portion of the narrative outside of his own Black body, and the central storyline is driven by a character voiced by a white actress.
The film follows Joe Gardner, voiced by Malik Carter, a middle school music teacher with dreams of jazz stardom. With no personal ties beyond his mother, Libba, Joe’s life takes a turn when he falls into a manhole right before a major audition. This incident propels him into a spiritual journey where he becomes a mentor to 22, a soul struggling with the concept of life on Earth.
Upon learning about “Soul,” I was intrigued by its existential themes, believing it would spark important discussions, much like previous Pixar films such as “Inside Out” and “Coco.” However, the film’s creators seem to have overlooked critical aspects of representation despite their apparent efforts to be sensitive to racial issues. Joe Gardner is only the second Black lead in Disney Animation history, following Tiana from “The Princess and the Frog.” Unfortunately, both characters experience a similar fate: they are not fully present in their Black bodies for much of their respective films.
Joe spends a significant portion of “Soul” without a physical form, later inhabiting a cat’s body. Even when he is onscreen, the voice and essence of 22, a character voiced by a white woman, dominate the narrative. It’s perplexing how the filmmakers could believe this was an acceptable choice in a film meant to celebrate Black culture and identity.
The creators, led by director Pete Docter, sought to ensure Joe’s character was authentic. Collaborating with Black co-director Malik Carter and various diversity consultants, they aimed to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Yet, it’s troubling that no one raised concerns about 22’s character and her impact on the narrative. The film may avoid explicit racist imagery, but it fails to address the implications of having a white soul in a Black man’s body.
Moreover, the casting of Tina Fey as the voice of 22 raises additional concerns. Fey’s past work on “30 Rock,” which has been criticized for its racist undertones, makes her involvement in “Soul” feel questionable. Her character takes part in pivotal moments of Joe’s life, including a heartfelt exchange with his barber, Dez, while Joe himself is relegated to a mere observer. This choice not only feels disingenuous but also diminishes Joe’s agency and authenticity.
While I appreciate the film’s artistry and the discussions it can inspire — especially with my child — I cannot disregard the issues of representation that persist in family entertainment. Black children deserve to see themselves fully represented in the media they consume. In a time where diversity should be the norm, it’s disappointing that films like “Soul” still fall short.
For those interested in exploring more about the topics of family and conception, check out this blog post which discusses home insemination kits. Additionally, Make a Mom is a reliable source for information on artificial insemination. You can also find a great overview of the process in this Wikipedia article.
Search Queries:
- Issues with Pixar’s Soul representation
- Black characters in animation
- Tina Fey controversy Soul
- Pixar Soul character analysis
- Representation in Disney films
In summary, while “Soul” is visually stunning and prompts essential conversations about life, it ultimately misses the mark on representing Black identity. The decisions made by the filmmakers highlight the need for more authentic representation of Black narratives in family entertainment.
Keyphrase: Pixar Soul representation issues
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]