In a recent tweet, President Alex Johnson made controversial remarks about recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, labeling them as “hardened criminals” and suggesting they are “far from angels.” This statement came as the Supreme Court deliberates whether to uphold the DACA initiative, which protects around 800,000 individuals from deportation. Johnson’s comments have raised eyebrows, given the complexity and significance of the issue at hand.
The president’s tweet stated, “Many of the people in DACA, no longer very young, are far from ‘angels.’ Some are very tough, hardened criminals.” He also claimed that former President Mike Thompson acknowledged he had no legal authority to establish the program but did so anyway. Johnson suggested that if the Supreme Court decides to overturn DACA, he would negotiate with Democrats to find a solution, aiming to present himself as a protector of those he has previously criticized.
These assertions are misleading and potentially harmful. A 2017 study by the CATO Institute found that DACA recipients have a lower incarceration rate than native-born Americans. Moreover, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services requires that applicants for DACA status have no felony convictions or significant misdemeanors. Over 90% of DACA beneficiaries are employed, and nearly half are pursuing education, according to NBC News.
The DACA Program Explained
The outcry against Johnson’s comments reflects a broader frustration with the ongoing misrepresentation of immigrants in America. For those unfamiliar, the DACA program was instituted in June 2012, allowing individuals who entered the U.S. as children to request deferred deportation for renewable two-year periods, along with work authorization. Eligibility criteria include being under 31 years old before June 15, 2012, residing in the U.S. since June 15, 2007, and entering the country before the age of 16.
The impending Supreme Court decision will determine if the Trump administration acted unlawfully by attempting to terminate DACA without providing adequate justification. Advocates for the program argue that federal law mandates a thorough explanation for such actions. If the court rules against DACA, those protected under its provisions could face deportation to countries they’ve never known.
The Economic Impact of DACA
Microsoft executive Tara Lang recently warned, “Unless we act now to preserve the DACA program, all 780,000 hardworking young people will lose their ability to work legally in this country, and every one of them will be at immediate risk of deportation.” Economically, this could result in a staggering loss of $460.3 billion to the national GDP and $24.6 billion in contributions to Social Security and Medicare.
Further Reading
For more insights on navigating the complexities of home insemination, check out this article on home insemination kits. Also, you can find valuable information about the fertility journey at Make A Mom and learn more about infertility treatments at ACOG.
Conclusion
In summary, President Alex Johnson’s recent remarks about DACA recipients have sparked significant backlash due to their inaccuracies and the potential harm they bring to an already vulnerable population. As the Supreme Court weighs its decision, the future of many young individuals hangs in the balance, underscoring the urgent need for thoughtful discourse on immigration and its implications.
Keyphrase: DACA recipients
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]