Altering women’s behavior in professional settings—whether it’s modifying how we negotiate for raises or adjusting our posture—won’t yield meaningful change because the real issue lies in systemic sexism, not in women’s actions.
However, when it comes to grooming, the situation shifts. Choosing to cut back on time spent with a hair straightener or a can of texturizing spray differs significantly from changing how you present yourself in a business meeting. Time and money are interchangeable; the thirty minutes spent perfecting your makeup could be better utilized elsewhere, and the $139 spent on a facial cleansing device might be redirected toward something truly enjoyable. By avoiding painful hair removal methods that involve burning or yanking, you’re likely to reclaim both time and money. My core argument centers on the potential benefits if women devoted less time to grooming and more time to living fully.
While it’s true, as Moore points out, that men often indulge in hobbies like sports or cars without suffering in the workplace, this is a reflection of sexism. Grooming, however, is not a trivial pastime; it is often an obligatory response to societal pressures that dictate a feminine appearance. The double standard is glaring: what’s deemed “appropriate for work” varies dramatically between genders, with women facing higher costs in terms of time and resources.
Moore argues that my piece falls into the trap of asking why women can’t simply rebel effectively enough to change societal norms. But grooming is one area where rebellion is not only justified but necessary. History is filled with feminist acts of defiance against oppressive beauty standards, from the suffragettes donning bloomers to flapper Irene Castle sporting a bob, and from Helen Hulick refusing to wear a dress in court to Hillary Clinton’s iconic pantsuits. Effecting cultural change often requires precisely this kind of rebellion.
Moore also correctly states that not every woman adheres to a demanding grooming regimen; many have mastered a quick and efficient routine. Additionally, it’s true that many women enjoy the process of primping (I’m certainly guilty of that!). And yes, men are not immune to spending time on their looks—marketers will capitalize on vanity and insecurity regardless of gender.
No one expects a total abandonment of grooming; I’m not suggesting we all leave the house resembling Animal from the Muppets. But we must confront the stark contrast between masculine and feminine grooming expectations, which consumes a significant amount of time and money. It is crucial to distinguish between the natural human desire to adorn oneself and the cultural pressures that create an imbalance, privileging one gender over another. For more insights on pregnancy and home insemination, you can check out this excellent resource.
In conclusion, while grooming will always be a part of our lives to some extent, understanding the broader implications of these practices can empower women to make choices that prioritize their well-being over societal expectations. If you’re interested in exploring ways to enhance your journey toward parenthood, consider checking out this home insemination kit or the Cryobaby home intracervical insemination kit for informed options.