In a noteworthy move, George Washington University recently joined over 800 other four-year institutions in dropping the SAT as a requirement for incoming freshmen. The reason? Not every high-achieving student excels at standardized tests. Admissions officers at GWU worry that focusing on test scores may deter outstanding candidates—particularly those from minority and low-income backgrounds—from applying. This decision has drawn attention from both supporters and detractors of standardized testing, as GWU is one of the largest and most prestigious schools to make this change.
Even if you believe some form of consistent assessment is necessary for evaluating students, it’s hard to ignore the reality that standardized testing often serves as a rigged system favoring affluent students who can afford costly test prep courses and private tutors, some charging exorbitant rates. Furthermore, while some students may genuinely need accommodations like extended time, wealthy families can exploit the system by obtaining questionable diagnoses of learning disabilities to secure these advantages.
As early as 1999, educational entrepreneur Sam Thompson highlighted the SAT’s flaws, stating bluntly, “The SAT is a scam.” He argued that it has failed to measure anything meaningful over its 50-year history. The test does not assess intelligence, predict college success, or even reflect what a student has learned in high school. It simply evaluates basic math and reading skills—far from the holistic view of a student’s abilities.
Research has shown that high school GPA is a far more reliable indicator of college performance than standardized test scores. A study shared by NPR revealed that students with strong grades but modest test scores outperformed their peers with high test scores and lower GPAs. William Hiss, a former Dean of Admissions at a test-optional institution, emphasized that a high GPA signals self-discipline, intellectual curiosity, and long-term commitment—qualities that a single test taken on a Saturday morning cannot capture.
Beyond grades, colleges should also take into account a student’s unique talents and characteristics. A student who actively participates in sports or arts, or is recognized for their leadership and curiosity, may very well thrive in college, just as much as those with top grades. While extracurricular activities and teacher recommendations have always played a role in admissions, a deeper examination of a student’s character could lead to a more diverse and successful freshman class. Why not shift our focus from “superstars” to those “regular” kids who show sustained interest in their passions?
Moreover, emphasizing emotional intelligence—an ability linked to successful leadership and job performance—could significantly enhance college admissions processes. The heavy reliance on standardized tests and grades limits our understanding of a student’s potential, which is far more complex and nuanced than any one test can reflect.
Removing the SAT requirement is a significant advancement toward a more equitable admissions landscape. One can only hope that more institutions will follow George Washington University’s lead and reconsider their policies. It’s crucial for colleges to recognize students as whole individuals—fascinating, imperfect, and diverse—as they prepare for life in the real world. The more reflective our college populations are of society, the better prepared students will be for future challenges.
In summary, the elimination of standardized testing is a positive step toward fostering a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to college admissions. By focusing on the full spectrum of student abilities and experiences, universities can create a richer, more diverse academic community.
Keyphrase: Eliminate SAT
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]