The Self-Serving Aspect of LGBTQ+ Rights

pregnant belly beside baby criblow cost ivf

As a passionate advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, I often find myself defending my stance to those who question my commitment. The most common inquiry I face is, “Why does it matter to you? You’re a straight, married woman. How do gay rights impact your life?” Sure, I could give the standard replies: I want my LGBTQ+ friends to enjoy the same rights I do, or it’s simply the morally right thing to do. Both would be accurate. However, if I dig deeper, my motivation is admittedly a bit more selfish.

Because my daughters might be part of the LGBTQ+ community.

Take Mia, who adores dinosaurs, and Sam, with her obsession for all things automotive. In our home, dolls and princesses are overshadowed by building blocks and race cars. I recognize I’m leaning on stereotypes, yet the reality remains: I can’t predict who they will love when they reach that stage of life. And honestly, I’m comfortable with that uncertainty.

What troubles me is the thought that my daughters might someday face limitations on their rights simply because of whom they choose to love. That’s unacceptable. It’s wrong. And it’s precisely why I care so passionately about LGBTQ+ rights.

If one of my daughters wishes to serve her country, she should have the freedom to do so—without having to hide her identity. As a parent, I naturally dread the idea of her being in danger. But if she expresses a strong desire to serve, how could I tell her, “Sorry, honey, you’ll have to suppress who you are if you want this life”? I constantly remind my girls that they are perfect just as they are, and I refuse to undermine that message later on.

Should one of them wish to marry a woman, I would relish the opportunity to organize the most extravagant and joyous wedding imaginable. I want to celebrate that love legally in all fifty states. If I’m going to invest time and energy into planning flowers and venues (or stylish tuxedos, depending on the couple), I expect my daughter to proudly declare, “This is my wife!” Their happily ever after should be just as valid as any heterosexual couple’s.

And if that daughter decides to adopt a child with her partner, woe betide anyone who stands between me and my future grandchild. The idea that adoption can be denied based on a non-traditional family structure baffles me. What does ‘traditional’ even mean today? Every family is unique, whether heterosexual or otherwise. The only criterion that should matter is the ability to provide love. Period. I have grandkids to spoil, and I won’t let outdated norms get in the way.

Is this selfish? Absolutely. My advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights primarily revolves around ensuring my daughters’ happiness in the future. They may very well grow up and choose to marry men just to tease their mom, but the truth is, we simply never know. What if they have children, and one of those grandchildren identifies as LGBTQ+? You can see where I’m headed with this, right?

LGBTQ+ rights matter to everyone. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but at some point, it will likely become a significant issue for you and your family, even if it isn’t already.

As a heterosexual woman, I deeply care about LGBTQ+ rights because the future is unpredictable.

And let’s be honest, it’s simply the right thing to do, regardless of whether your motivations are self-serving or selfless.

For more insights on family planning and LGBTQ+ issues, check out this excellent resource on fertility treatment. Additionally, if you’re interested in exploring home insemination options, you may find this guide on artificial insemination kits helpful.

Summary:

This article explores the personal motivations behind a heterosexual mother’s advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, emphasizing the potential impact on her daughters and future grandchildren. It highlights the importance of love and acceptance, challenging societal norms surrounding family structures and marriage.

Keyphrase: LGBTQ+ rights and family
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]