A British politician is facing intense scrutiny following the emergence of racist text messages sent by his girlfriend regarding Meghan Markle. Richard Steel, a prominent figure in the UK Independence Party (UKIP), has been urged to resign after the inflammatory comments from his partner, 25-year-old model Chloe Hart, came to light.
The controversy ignited after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their engagement in November, with plans to marry in the spring. Markle, an American actress known for her role on the television series Suits, has been at the center of public interest since the announcement. However, Hart’s sentiments towards the actress were far from supportive, as she reportedly sent a series of derogatory messages to a friend.
According to reports from the Daily Mail, her messages began with statements expressing her aversion to engaging with someone of a different ethnicity, referring to them as “ugly.” She went on to label Markle a “slut,” a term used in British slang for promiscuous women, and described her as a “gender equality t***” who is “fixated on race” and a “dumb little commoner.” Hart further insulted Markle, claiming she has a “tiny brain” and that her offspring would “taint our Royal Family.”
In a particularly shocking message, she remarked, “this is Britain, not Africa,” prompting her friend to call her out for being racist. Despite the backlash, Hart defended her views, claiming that her desire to maintain cultural integrity did not equate to hatred. “Lol so what,” she replied, emphasizing her belief that differing cultures should not “invade” hers. To be clear, two people marrying is a celebration, not an invasion. Hart should perhaps revisit Britain’s historical context to understand the meaning of invasions better.
Upon learning of the messages, UKIP promptly suspended Hart and initiated an investigation. UKIP’s chairman, Martin Clarke, stated, “UKIP does not, has not, and never will condone racism.” The fallout from the texts also prompted calls for Steel to step down, especially in light of previous controversies involving his personal life, including leaving his wife and children for Hart.
Following the revelation, Hart issued a formal apology, expressing remorse for the hurt her words caused. “I sincerely apologize for the shocking language I used. My comments were exaggerated for effect and have been taken out of context. I fully recognize the offense they have caused,” she stated. Hart expressed her disappointment in herself and acknowledged the hurt inflicted upon the public and her loved ones.
In the wake of this incident, Steel announced he has ended his relationship with Hart, recognizing that their partnership was “obviously quite incompatible” with his political role, though he stated he would not resign from his position.
For those interested in navigating similar issues or discussions about family dynamics, you might find insightful information on artificial insemination and other parenting topics on our blog, or check out our post on at-home insemination kits for more resources.
In summary, the incident involving Richard Steel and Chloe Hart underscores the ongoing challenges of racism and public figures’ responsibilities. The political landscape continues to evolve, and so does the societal discourse surrounding race and identity.