In the wake of the #MeToo movement, it has become clear that there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to how victims of trauma navigate their experiences. As more women come forward to share their stories, emotions are understandably heightened. Recently, Lily Markham, one of the earliest voices against the misconduct in Hollywood, criticized fellow actresses planning to wear black gowns at the upcoming Golden Globes as a form of protest.
Actress and fellow advocate, Amber Thompson, did not hold back in her response, taking to Twitter to confront Markham for her “shaming” of other women. In a now-deleted tweet, Markham expressed her disdain for actresses, including renowned stars like Meryl Streep, who she accused of hypocrisy for participating in the protest while having previously worked with powerful figures accused of sexual misconduct. “Actresses, like Meryl Streep, who willingly collaborated with The Pig Monster, are wearing black @GoldenGlobes in a silent protest,” she tweeted. “YOUR SILENCE is THE problem. You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real change. I despise your hypocrisy. Maybe you should all wear Marchesa.” (Marchesa is a fashion label founded by Georgina Chapman, the wife of Harvey Weinstein.)
Thompson’s rebuttal was well-received by many on social media, who praised her for speaking out against Markham’s remarks. While some believe that Markham’s perspective is still valid, it’s essential to recognize that there is no singular way to deal with trauma or to engage in peaceful protest. If every actress attending the Golden Globes opts to wear black, it undeniably makes a statement that will capture attention and spark discussion. This protest, regardless of individual feelings about it, has an impact.
It’s important to remember that many people were unaware of the extent of Weinstein’s actions until recently. Markham’s harsh words targeted Streep, who has consistently denied any knowledge of Weinstein’s history. In response to the controversy, Streep issued a statement expressing her hurt over Markham’s comments. “It hurt to be attacked by Lily Markham in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others,” she said.
While we can’t fault Markham for her anger—toward Weinstein or the industry that ostracized her—Thompson highlights that lashing out at fellow victims and supporters won’t facilitate meaningful change. Following her conversation with Thompson, Markham did offer a public apology.
For those interested in exploring more about the journey of motherhood and the challenges surrounding it, including topics like home insemination, check out this guide on at-home intracervical insemination. It serves as a valuable resource for anyone navigating fertility issues, along with the insights shared on this authority site that covers similar topics. Additionally, for comprehensive information on pregnancy and infertility, this women’s health resource is an excellent starting point.
In summary, Amber Thompson’s response to Lily Markham emphasizes the importance of solidarity among women, particularly in the face of trauma. As the conversation around the #MeToo movement continues, it’s crucial to foster understanding and support, rather than division.