Like many women I know, I’ve gone through phases of disliking my body. There were years filled with anxiety over my weight, times when I skipped meals and even deprived myself of nourishment. I look back at my early twenties, when I was at my thinnest—surviving on coffee until evening—and realize I wasn’t truly happy or healthy. Ironically, those were the years when the medical establishment deemed me “healthy” based on my weight.
Enter BMI. Why does the medical community cling so tightly to this number?
BMI, or Body Mass Index, is a formula that calculates the relationship between your height and weight. A doctor or an online calculator inputs your height and weight, performs a calculation, and gives you a number that supposedly indicates whether you fall into categories like “normal,” “overweight,” or “obese.” This number is then used as a supposed indicator of overall health.
But there are serious flaws with BMI—it’s not just me who thinks so. Even healthcare professionals criticize its validity. Dr. Sam Roberts, a physician at a well-respected clinic, notes, “BMI doesn’t measure health or physiological states that indicate disease. It merely reflects size. Many people with high or low BMI are perfectly healthy, while those with a ‘normal’ BMI may be at risk for various health issues.”
Exactly! BMI ignores critical factors, such as muscle mass versus fat percentage, fat distribution, genetic predispositions, activity levels, and overall health behaviors.
What’s more, BMI was never intended to gauge health. It was developed in the 1830s by Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet, a Belgian mathematician—not a physician. His goal was to analyze population statistics, not individual well-being. Quetelet’s calculations were based solely on the measurements of French and Scottish individuals from over 200 years ago. It’s no surprise that my diverse Eastern European Jewish body type gets labeled as “overweight” under these outdated criteria.
Dr. Roberts suggests that while BMI shouldn’t be disregarded entirely, it’s essential to use it in conjunction with other health indicators, much like cholesterol or blood pressure. I see his point, but I have to disagree. Any metric that reduces individuals to labels like “overweight” or “obese” is harmful. These labels can linger, affecting self-esteem and potentially leading to issues like body dysmorphia and disordered eating.
While it’s true that excess weight can sometimes lead to health problems, we must be careful not to blame it for every issue. Isolating weight as the sole factor in health is misleading. Just like diet culture and its toxic standards of beauty, BMI needs to go. It stigmatizes people from childhood to old age, rooted in a calculation created by someone who wasn’t even studying the full spectrum of human body types.
In fact, I recently checked my own BMI and was classified as “overweight” at a BMI of 25. Yet, I exercise regularly, maintain a healthy diet, and my recent check-up showed I’m in excellent health. So, bye-bye, BMI! Your outdated number doesn’t define my health or anyone else’s worth.
For more insights on this topic, check out our post on home insemination, where we explore various aspects of family planning. For those considering at-home insemination, Make a Mom is a great resource for supplies. Additionally, the Mayo Clinic offers excellent information about IUI and related procedures.
In summary, it’s time to rethink how we measure health. BMI is an outdated and inaccurate tool that often does more harm than good. Let’s focus on holistic health rather than arbitrary numbers.
Keyphrase: BMI flawed metric
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]