When we brought our first child home from the hospital, my partner took a mere two and a half weeks off work. It felt as though I was whisked out of the OR post-c-section, and in the blink of an eye, I found myself waving goodbye from a rocking chair in our bedroom. I was still recovering from surgery, had limited mobility in our townhouse, and the thought of facing a day alone with our newborn was terrifying.
That first night, he returned to find me right where he had left me. Sure, I had managed to change some diapers, clean bottles, and take a quick bathroom break, but I was still utterly wiped out. I thought sleep deprivation couldn’t get worse, yet somehow it escalated to a new level of sheer exhaustion.
A couple of years later, we welcomed our second child, and this time my partner took six weeks off. By then, I was healing and adjusting, but now managing two little ones was a whole new challenge. While six weeks was a significant improvement over the previous two and a half weeks—and more than any of his colleagues had taken—I still wasn’t prepared to handle the majority of the day alone. If you’ve had a baby, you know those awake hours can stretch endlessly, often punctuated by crying.
Not only did I crave my partner’s assistance, but he also desired more time at home bonding with our new baby. That bonding time is essential for fathers as much as for mothers, and it’s disheartening that our society fails to recognize and promote this.
The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) mandates that employers with at least 50 employees provide 12 weeks of protected but unpaid leave to eligible employees for various medical or family reasons, including the birth or adoption of a child. Established in 1993, the FMLA is outdated and hardly worth its paper. For starters, it only covers about sixty percent of the private sector due to that “50 or more employees” rule. Furthermore, only sixteen percent of eligible individuals utilized FMLA in 2011. And let’s not forget—it’s unpaid. It’s not sick leave, and it’s certainly not a robust maternity leave option. It merely states that your employer can’t fire you for 12 weeks if you have a qualifying medical or family issue. This is simply unacceptable.
Thankfully, some companies are stepping up to support their employees and society by exceeding legal requirements. For instance, Workday, a tech firm in California, provides childcare, 100 days of paid maternity leave, and 60 days of paid paternity leave. Patagonia, an outdoor apparel brand, boasts a 100% retention rate among female employees returning after maternity leave, largely due to its family-friendly benefits, including onsite high-quality childcare and an extensive medical leave policy. They even arrange transportation for older children to visit their parents at work after school! How wonderful is that?
Progressive companies that support working parents tend to see better representation of women in leadership roles since they don’t have to choose between career and family. Fathers enjoying more quality time with their kids ultimately benefits the entire family unit, as no parent has to sacrifice work for family.
The claim that more workplaces can’t offer these benefits because it’s a burden is simply nonsense. When Patagonia calculated the costs of maintaining their onsite childcare facilities, they discovered it constituted a mere 0.005 percent of their total expenses. While some companies, particularly in tech, are beginning to enhance their parental leave policies, it still falls short of helping the vast number of Americans who need support, especially when childcare can exceed monthly mortgage payments.
Every developed nation manages to provide better support for working parents than the United States does. Despite the rhetoric about America being “the greatest country in the world,” it’s clear we have a long way to go in getting our priorities straight. If we truly care about “family values,” why aren’t we doing more to help families, especially when evidence shows it’s beneficial for business?
We can and must do better. Will we? Probably not, since this country often glorifies “job creators” while treating actual workers—the backbone of the economy—as disposable. Those who dare to request anything resembling what every other developed country offers for parents are often shamed for expecting too much, while simultaneously being told to have more children. Confusing, isn’t it?
I think I’ll go scream into a pillow now. When I resurface, let’s hope that working parents finally receive the support they deserve!
For more insights on parenting and family planning, check out our article on home insemination kits and learn about navigating your couples fertility journey. For additional resources on pregnancy, visit WomensHealth.gov.
Summary
This article emphasizes the urgent need for better support systems for working parents in the U.S. It critiques the outdated Family Medical Leave Act and highlights progressive companies that are making strides in parental leave policies. The piece argues that improving these systems is not just a matter of family values, but also beneficial for businesses and society as a whole.
Keyphrase: Support for Working Parents
Tags: [“home insemination kit” “home insemination syringe” “self insemination”]