In the wake of each mass shooting, society often divides into three distinct factions: 1) Those who insist that “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people,” closely aligned with the mindset of “If we ban guns, only criminals will have them”; 2) Advocates for sensible gun regulations aimed at curbing these horrific events; and 3) Those who vehemently argue against politicizing these tragedies.
Let’s dissect why two of these viewpoints are fundamentally flawed. The first two arguments tend to coalesce. Recently, 59 individuals fell victim to a mass shooting in Las Vegas, with over 500 others injured. In that city, it’s perfectly legal to stroll down the street with a machine gun. Following yet another incident where a white man “snapped” and committed mass murder, many rightfully propose that we need to reform our laws to prevent future occurrences. This is often countered by the claim that guns are merely “tools” and that if someone intends to harm others, they can do so with a hammer or knife. These defenders subscribe to the NRA’s narrative that everyone should be armed to combat “bad guys” with guns.
But let’s break down these arguments: A man from the 32nd floor of a hotel could not have inflicted the same level of devastation by hurling hammers or knives out of his window. While it’s true that cars can be used in attacks, they are also subject to laws requiring registration and insurance. Sure, some may still drive without these, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t enforce regulations. Just as limits on Sudafed purchases don’t eliminate meth abuse, they do reduce its incidence. Seatbelt laws don’t guarantee safety for every child in a car, but they significantly lower the risk. The same goes for laws against drunk driving—they don’t eradicate the issue, but they make a difference.
This is the only topic where the argument against taking action is that we cannot completely eliminate the problem. Imagine if doctors said, “This treatment will help you lower your cholesterol and reduce your heart attack risk,” only for people to oppose it because “some will still have heart attacks.”
Now, a new narrative has emerged: “This is not the time to discuss it.” When, then, is a good moment? Emotions are running high; families are grieving! Yes, I am politicizing this tragedy—because it is a political issue. Sanity should not be a partisan concern. Just like we would analyze building codes after a dam failure, we must address our gun crisis.
Let’s be clear: AMERICA HAS A GUN PROBLEM.
We should all feel disturbed by this reality. Addressing it cannot wait for next week, next year, or until the scene has been cleaned. It must be tackled immediately. We often forget too quickly. The chaos of our current political climate leads to a collective memory lapse. Just two days ago, the president engaged in one of the most appalling and racist acts imaginable—and yet, we’re already moving on to the next horror show.
The time for meaningful discussions about gun control is now. Not two weeks from now. Right now. There are actionable steps we can take to lessen these tragedies, and discussing these solutions is not disrespectful to the victims. In fact, it would be disrespectful to ignore the need for change.
America doesn’t just need your “thoughts and prayers.” We need ACTION—immediate and decisive. Not after the next crisis, but NOW!
For those interested in exploring options for starting a family, you can check out Cryobaby’s at-home insemination kit as a resource. Also, if you are looking for a home-based solution, consider this intracervical insemination syringe kit combo. For further information on pregnancy and insemination, visit the CDC’s pregnancy page.
In summary, the urgency of addressing America’s gun problem cannot be overstated. Conversations about reform must happen immediately, not postponed until the next distraction arises.
Keyphrase: gun violence reform
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]