As a parent of three, I’ve spent considerable time reflecting on the implications of this election. Frankly, I’m filled with anxiety—not just for our nation today, but for the long-term effects on the generations to come. It’s easy to think of politics as separate from our personal values, but the reality is that our choices at the ballot box reveal who we are as individuals.
I aspire to set a positive example for my children, and I refuse to fall into the trap of “do as I say, not as I do.” This election presents a challenging dilemma for parents like me. Here’s what I find unacceptable:
- How can I advise my children against mocking those who are different or bullying others, and then support a candidate who embodies those very behaviors? I simply cannot.
- Can I instill the principles of empathy and the importance of aiding others, while casting my vote for someone who lacks those qualities? I cannot do that.
- How do I justify voting for someone who disparages women, while teaching my son to respect them? The contradiction is unacceptable to me.
- Is it possible to teach my children the value of kindness and integrity, while backing a candidate who flaunts unethical business practices? I can’t reconcile that.
- Can I tell my children to bring solutions to problems, yet vote for a person who offers no constructive plans, aside from simplistic ideas like building a wall? I cannot support that.
As John Oliver aptly put it, we need politicians who are truthful but not harmful. The words spoken during this campaign carry weight, and once said, they can’t be taken back. People may forgive, but they seldom forget.
Many supporters of the current candidate are driven by a desire for change, tired of the usual political figures. However, “different” does not guarantee improvement. As Stephen Morris, a former advisor, recently remarked, the ignorance displayed is profoundly disheartening. This candidate has no experience in governance and has failed to present any substantial policies. If your child required a critical medical procedure, would you entrust their care to someone without formal training? If you wouldn’t do that for your child, why consider it for your country?
When I contemplate the implications of this election for my children, it reinforces the necessity of teaching them to live boldly and without fear. The current campaign thrives on fostering fear—depicting a world rife with danger and division. Yet, the facts reveal a different story. The probability of dying from a terrorist attack is astronomically low, and it’s crucial to remind our children that not all individuals of a certain background are threats. We cannot preach courage and resilience while endorsing a figure who promotes fear and division.
This transcends mere politics; it speaks to our very identity as individuals and as parents. We are capable of more, and our children deserve better. They rely on us to guide them toward a brighter future.
For those interested in navigating the journey of parenthood and home insemination, check out resources like In Vitro Fertilisation on Wikipedia and explore helpful articles on couples’ fertility journeys or at-home insemination kits.
Summary
This article discusses the moral dilemmas faced by a parent when considering their vote in an election. It emphasizes the importance of embodying values such as empathy and respect, and how these values should inform voting decisions. The author argues that the implications of this election will affect future generations and stresses the need for parents to set positive examples.
Keyphrase: Importance of Voting for Children
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]