Aerie’s Body Positive Male Underwear Campaign: A Misguided Prank

silhouette of man kissing woman's bellylow cost ivf

In a surprising twist, Aerie’s much-anticipated body positive underwear campaign for men turned out to be an ill-conceived April Fool’s joke. Traditionally, underwear advertisements feature conventionally attractive individuals with idealized physiques. While models play a significant role in marketing, they hardly represent the average male or female body types in society. Thus, when Aerie announced AerieMan—a campaign showcasing a range of diverse and relatable male figures—there was widespread excitement. The idea of promoting body positivity among average men was refreshing and long overdue.

However, as it was revealed, this campaign was nothing more than a publicity stunt initiated on March 24, leading up to April Fool’s Day. The initial excitement quickly transformed into confusion and disappointment. This was particularly disheartening because Aerie had previously established a reputation for authenticity by eliminating Photoshopping and featuring women of various shapes and sizes in their advertisements.

The campaign kicked off with quirky videos that featured men confidently flaunting their bodies in unretouched underwear. While the content was quirky and unconventional, the reaction from the public was overwhelmingly positive. Esteemed outlets like InStyle noted that the campaign effectively communicated the message that “the real you is sexy.” Influential figures, including lifestyle blogger Mark Thompson, expressed hope that this was not a mere stunt, praising the brand for promoting diversity.

Yet, the backlash came quickly when the truth behind the campaign surfaced. Social media erupted with outrage, as many felt that Aerie’s prank trivialized important issues surrounding body image and self-acceptance. Had American Eagle, Aerie’s parent company, done something similar with their “Real Women” campaign, they would have faced significant backlash and potential boycotts. The perception that men are less affected by societal standards of beauty is problematic and dismissive of the struggles many face.

Chad Kessler, Global Brand President of American Eagle Outfitters, stated, “We aren’t afraid of being bold in how we engage our customers… We are an all-inclusive brand and we know our male customers respond to humor.” If this is what American Eagle considers humor, one can only wonder what they view as offensive.

Moreover, the company missed a golden opportunity to embrace the positive reception of their campaign. Given that their previous body-positive initiatives for women led to increased sales, it seems logical to extend that approach to men. Instead of maintaining the prank, they should have pivoted to make the campaign a reality.

The brand did make a $25,000 donation to the National Eating Disorders Association, which many perceive as an inadequate gesture. Body positivity is not a joke; it is a critical issue affecting individuals of all genders. Aerie had the chance to champion this cause, and they squandered it.

In conclusion, the AerieMan campaign demonstrates the delicate balance brands must strike when addressing sensitive topics like body image. It serves as a reminder that humor should never come at the expense of authenticity and respect. For those exploring their options for home insemination, you can visit BabyMaker Home Intracervical Insemination Syringe Kit Combo and BabyMaker At-Home Insemination Kit for valuable resources. For comprehensive pregnancy guidance, refer to March of Dimes.

Keyphrase: Aerie body positive campaign

Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]

modernfamilyblog.com