I have twin boys who are four years old, and they embody the quintessential spirit of little boys—excited by dirt, bugs, and mud. Although they look alike, they are incredibly different individuals. It’s a crucial distinction because they often get grouped together as simply “the twins,” Ethan and Noah. To emphasize their uniqueness, I avoid dressing them in matching outfits. This was especially relevant during our recent trip to the shoe store, where Noah expressed his desire for sparkly pink shoes designed for girls.
Noah has a flair for the dramatic. He adores pink and purple, and his love for all things frilly sometimes surprises me. Last Halloween, he chose a pink plastic pumpkin for trick-or-treating, and it has quickly become one of his treasured possessions. So, when he gravitated toward those pink, sparkly shoes, I couldn’t help but chuckle—until I had to say no. I explained that they weren’t practical for playing outside and that he wouldn’t want to ruin them in the mud. He accepted my reasoning and selected a pair of standard boys’ sneakers, and for the moment, all was well.
As I paid for their new sneakers, I reflected on why I had said no to the sparkly shoes. The truth is, I didn’t want him to face bullying or feel ashamed of his choices. I was trying to protect him from a harsh world, shielding his feelings and preserving his innocence. Yet, a part of me longed to buy those shoes. Shouldn’t I empower him to embrace who he is rather than shield him from potential cruelty? Innocence is a gift unique to children, and while society has evolved to be more accepting, there are still narrow-minded individuals out there. I didn’t want Noah to confront that reality just yet.
In his eyes, those shoes were simply beautiful, sparkly items he wanted to wear. But I didn’t buy them. And in hindsight, I should have. I missed an opportunity to teach him a meaningful lesson: “Be proud of who you are. Celebrate your individuality.” Instead, by not purchasing the shoes, I inadvertently conveyed a message of conformity: “Fit in with the other boys. Don’t express yourself too boldly. You’ll avoid hurt that way, and you can remain innocent forever.”
That’s not the kind of upbringing I aspire to provide for my boys. From the very beginning, I’ve encouraged them to embrace differences and appreciate that no two people are alike. This diversity enriches our lives and makes the world a more wonderful place. I’ve taught them to be kind, gentle, and loving. Yet, with one mundane outing, I might have inadvertently led Noah down a path of conformity instead of self-expression.
At his age, he is blissfully unaware that sparkly shoes are typically marketed for girls. He doesn’t know that boys don’t usually wear tutus or that his beloved pink pumpkin is traditionally associated with girls. He simply enjoys sparkles and dressing up. He knows that his twin brother prefers red and superheroes, while he is drawn to My Little Ponies and the color pink. But is it wrong for a mother to want to maintain that innocent perspective for as long as possible? Will he remember that day when I said no to the pink shoes? Will it affect how he views himself in the future? I hope not.
For more information about pregnancy options, check out this excellent resource on donor insemination at American Pregnancy. And if you’re interested in at-home insemination, Make a Mom has some great products available, including their impregnator kit.
In summary, the dilemma of allowing children to express themselves while protecting them from potential societal cruelty is complex. As parents, we must navigate these waters carefully, ensuring we encourage individuality while being mindful of the realities of the world.
Keyphrase: pink sparkly shoes
Tags: [“home insemination kit”, “home insemination syringe”, “self insemination”]