Charter School Allegedly Maintains ‘Got To Go’ List to Remove Unwanted Students

pregnant woman in yellow flower dress holding her bellylow cost ivf

When it comes to charter schools, many tout their ability to deliver superior education compared to traditional public institutions. However, a recent exposé by a major news outlet has sparked debate over whether this reputation is well-deserved. Success Academy, a prominent charter school network in New York City, stands accused of maintaining a list of students it allegedly seeks to push out of its schools. Although charter schools receive government funding, they are privately managed and, like public schools, are obligated to educate every enrolled student unless they voluntarily withdraw, are expelled, turn 21, or relocate out of state. Reports suggest that at least one campus in the Success Academy network has employed questionable tactics to pressure parents into withdrawing students deemed undesirable.

The report recounts the experience of a parent, Jessica Thompson, whose kindergartner attended a Success Academy school in Fort Greene, Brooklyn. Jessica’s six-year-old faced repeated disciplinary actions for seemingly minor infractions, such as not keeping her hands in her lap, and Jessica felt the punishments were unjust. Documents revealed to the media indicated that her daughter was allegedly included on a blacklist of 16 students compiled by the school’s administration, humorously dubbed the “Got To Go” list. This list reportedly consisted of students whom school officials wanted to remove for various reasons, and the ongoing disciplinary measures appeared to be a calculated effort to compel parents to withdraw their children.

This isn’t the first time Success Academy has faced allegations of trying to push students out. Whispered rumors have long circulated about the network’s impressive academic performance being a result of “weeding out” students who may struggle. Former staff members, speaking anonymously, confirmed these suspicions. One individual recounted a principal’s directive against sending annual re-enrollment forms home with certain students, indicating the school’s desire to avoid their return.

Charter schools pride themselves on their ability to provide better educational outcomes for diverse student populations. They are expected to welcome all types of students and create opportunities for success. Actively attempting to remove students to improve test scores is a blatant violation of this promise.

While every student may not thrive in a given educational environment, targeting specific children to force them out of school is unethical. If a school opts to operate in such a discriminatory manner, many parents would likely prefer not to support it financially.

In conclusion, this situation raises significant concerns about the practices of charter schools nationwide and how they maintain their polished images. The idea of a school actively attempting to blacklist young children is disturbing and represents a misuse of public funds that should be aimed at fostering educational growth.

If you want to explore more about home insemination, you can check out this detailed guide on at-home insemination kits.

Keyphrase: Charter School Allegations

Tags: home insemination kit, home insemination syringe, self insemination

modernfamilyblog.com