As a parent, I used to take a thoughtful, hands-on approach when teaching my children about life’s lessons. For instance, if one of my kids decided to climb the banister and slide down, I would say something like:
“Wait a moment! I understand that looks entertaining on television, but in reality, sliding down banisters is not safe. Can you explain why? Exactly! It’s dangerous because banisters are not designed for sliding; they exist to ensure your safety on the stairs. Now, what could happen if you were to fall off while sliding? Yes, you could get seriously hurt. Can you think of a safer alternative? Yes! A playground slide would be much better. Great job! Now, let’s wrap this up with a nice cuddle.”
That approach seems sweet, doesn’t it? I took the time to help my children reach their own conclusions about safety, nutritious choices, and appropriate times for nudity. After all, they are the ones living their lives and learning from experiences.
However, in recent times, I find myself resorting to more direct methods—especially during those chaotic hours between waking and bedtime. When a child is about to do something like bite the dog, there’s simply no time for lengthy explanations. Sarcasm and passive-aggressive questions like, “Do we put toys in the toilet?” or “Should you wash your hair with pudding?” have become my go-to tactics.
I can’t help but feel that the reason I’m less inclined to have those educational moments is that, at times, my children seem to act without any common sense. A wall turns into their canvas for diaper cream “art,” while shirtsleeves serve as makeshift handkerchiefs. My sanity? That’s just a punching bag.
“Do we paint our brother?” “Are bookcases made for climbing?” “Is it okay to fart on people?”
Some days, I feel like I’m merely a supplier of snacks and rhetorical questions aimed at teaching basic reasoning. It’s astonishing to witness behaviors that defy logic, such as a child willingly consuming crayons. I find myself questioning the very essence of their decision-making capabilities.
“Are umbrellas swords?” “Do we store things in our underpants?” “Is it acceptable to lick the floor?”
I’ve started highlighting the most basic truths in an effort to guide these little ones—who Ralph Waldo Emerson famously referred to as “curly, dimpled lunatics”—toward realizing that jumping is meant for trampolines, not their siblings’ prone bodies, even if there’s laughter involved.
“Should mommy come to the dinner table naked?” “Are dogs supposed to wear shoes?” “Do we eat dirt?”
It’s undeniably exhausting to constantly correct little beings who seem to thrive on making mistakes. Yet, I hold onto a flicker of hope, the kind that only a parent can possess, that one day I won’t find myself asking, “Does that go in your nose?”
In conclusion, parenting often feels like an endless cycle of rhetorical questions aimed at instilling common sense. If you’re interested in exploring home insemination, resources like ACOG offer valuable information, while Cryobaby’s home intracervical insemination syringe kit is an excellent option for those considering self-insemination. You can also check out this article for additional insights.
Keyphrase: rhetorical parenting questions
Tags: [“home insemination kit” “home insemination syringe” “self insemination”]